ISSN 2660-9037
CLÍO: Revista de ciencias humanas y pensamiento crítico
Año 3, Núm 5. Enero / Junio (2023)
pp. 414-419. Provincia de Pontevedra - España
Guidelines
1. METHODS OF SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION OF WORKS
Researchers interested in publishing their work in Ediciones Clío should
send their proposal to the following emails. esdicionesclio.es@gmail.com.
Proposals must have: identication of the author or authors, indicating:
name, surname, institution that they represent (university, institute, research
center, foundation), email, curriculum summary of each author with an ex-
tension no greater than ten (10) lines, incorporate the link of each ORCID of
each author and provide a cell phone number with the international code
of the country of origin. Likewise, a written communication signed by the
authors and addressed to the director of the magazine will be presented
stating that he expresses interest in proposing their work for publication.
Proposed articles or writings must be unpublished and must not have
been simultaneously proposed to other publications. All works will be eva-
luated by a Committee of Specialist Referees of recognized prestige in each
of the areas of knowledge that are proposed. The evaluation of the Referees
will be carried out through the procedure known as a pair of blind men: the
referees and the authors will not know their respective identities. The evalua-
tion criteria are the following:
a.- Formal or presentation criteria: 1) originality, relevance and adequate
extension of the title; 2) clarity and coherence of speech; 3) adequate prepa-
ration of the summary; 4) internal organization of the text; 5) all other criteria
established in these regulations.
b.- Content criteria: 1) domain of evidenced knowledge; 2) scientic rigor;
3) theoretical and methodological foundation; 4) topicality and relevance of
the sources consulted; 5) contributions to existing knowledge.
Upon receipt of the response from the appointed Referees Committee,
the authors will be informed by email of the corresponding decision; In case
of being accepted, the work should be sent by email to the contacts - mail,
WhatsApp - provided by the magazine.
CLÍO:
Revista de ciencias humanas y pensamiento crítico.
Año 3, Núm 5. Enero / Junio (2023)
Guidelines for sending and receiving papers. PP: 414-419
ISSN 2660-9037
415
2. PRESENTATION OF THE WORKS
The works must present an abstract of 150 words maximum and up to
four keywords; both the abstract and the keywords will be in Spanish and
English. Likewise, the title and subtitle of the work will also be presented in
Spanish and English. The maximum length of the work must not exceed a
maximum of twenty (20) pages and a minimum of fteen (15). All papers will
be presented in letter-size digital Word format, with continuous numbering
and with margins of (2) centimeters on each side. The text will be presented
at a space and a half, in Times New Roman font, size 12. For footnotes, the
size will be in Times New Roman font size 10.
3. BODY OF THE ARTICLE
Title: It should be short, explanatory and contain the essence of the work.
This title must be provided in both Spanish and English.
Author (s): Indicate the full names and surnames, the name of the insti-
tution where the work was carried out or the institution to which the author
belongs. This should be placed as a footnote on the rst page of the article.
Abstract: No more than one hundred fty (150) words, in Spanish and
English. In case the work is presented in another language. The abstract
must be written in the same language, in Spanish and English.
Keywords: Keywords in Spanish and English should be included in a
number that ranges from three to four words. These descriptive words faci-
litate the inclusion of the article in the international database.
Sections and Sub-sections: It is recommended, if applicable, to divide
the work into: summary, introduction, theoretical foundations, methodolo-
gy, analysis or discussion, conclusion or nal considerations and references.
Each of the sections or sub-sections will be numbered with Arabic numerals.
Citations: The citation will be made in the text using the author-date
modality, indicating, if it is a textual appointment, it is located within the pa-
rentheses: last name (s) of the author, comma, year of publication of the
work, followed by a colon and the number (s) of the page (s), for example:
according to (Granadillo, 1998: 45); if it is not a textual quotation but a pa-
raphrase, the year number will not be indicated, for example: according to
Granadillo (1998) or (Granadillo, 1998). If there are several works by the
same author published in the same year, they will be arranged literally in
alphabetical order; for example, (Granadillo, 2008a: 12), Granadillo (2008b:
CLÍO:
Revista de ciencias humanas y pensamiento crítico.
Año 3, Núm 5. Enero / Junio (2023)
Guidelines for sending and receiving papers. PP: 414-419
ISSN 2660-9037
416
24). If there are two authors, only the rst surname of each will be placed,
for example: According to Pietri and Granadillo (2008: 90) or (Pietri and Gra-
nadillo, 2008: 90), following the same criteria explained above for textual
citations and paraphrase. If there are three or more authors, the last name
of the main author will be placed followed by “et al”, example: (Rincón et al,
2008: 45). Quotations from unpublished works or works in print, as well as
references to communications and private documents of limited circulation,
should be avoided as much as possible, unless strictly necessary. In the case
of documentary, electronic or other sources that by their nature are unviable
or complex for the adoption of the aforementioned author - date, suggested
in these regulations, the one cited at the bottom of the page can be resorted
to or chosen.
Bibliographic references: References (bibliographic, newspaper, oral
and / or documentary) will be presented at the end of the text. The order of
the references is alphabetical by surname. The dierent works by the same
author will be organized chronologically, in ascending order, and if there are
two or more works by the same author and year, the strict alphabetical order
by title will be maintained.
They will refer only to those cited in the work and will be ordered in strict
alphabetical order. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the referen-
ces.
If they are books or manuals, they must contain surname (s) and name (s),
of the authors in capital letters (period); year of publication in parentheses
(period) title of work in bold (period), place of editorial publication.
If it is information obtained by electronic means, the bibliographic refe-
rence must contain the same elements indicated by the articles added to:
electronic means, address electronic or web page, date of retrieval and any
other information that is considered useful for the full identication of the
reference.
Annexes: the annexes constitute complementary elements of the text
that the reader refers to a part of the work or outside of it, with the purpo-
se of illustrating the ideas presented in the text, expanding or clarifying or
complementing what is expressed there. The annexes are counted as part
of the number of pages of the document. In the case of gures and tables,
the author may accompany the original with the illustrations that he deems
necessary.
CLÍO:
Revista de ciencias humanas y pensamiento crítico.
Año 3, Núm 5. Enero / Junio (2023)
Guidelines for sending and receiving papers. PP: 414-419
ISSN 2660-9037
417
Other Works: The following short works are also accepted (maximum fteen
pages): Conferences, Essays, Reviews: recent reading comments. Reviews: critical
analysis (or comment) of recent reading, documents, texts of a historical and legal
nature, agreements, statements, interviews: carried out for research purposes.
Any other unforeseen situation will be resolved by the editors as they
deem appropriate to the interests of the magazine.
4. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE PUBLICATION.
Focus and scope
The Clío magazine is a publication sponsored by Ediciones Clío, the Aca-
demy of History of the Zulia State, the Zulia Center for Genealogical Research,
the Center for Historical Studies of the University of Zulia and the Internatio-
nal Network on Research Teaching; among other associated centers.
Its objectives include:
• Contribute to the scientic progress of Historical Science and Human
Sciences, through the dissemination of research and research advan-
ces proposed by their authors.
• Stimulate research in Social Sciences, as well as in all related disciplines.
• Promote the presentation, discussion and confrontation of ideas and
scientic advances with social commitment.
Clío appears at least twice a year and publishes original works with advan-
ces or research results in the areas of Sciences described above, which are
submitted to the consideration of qualied referees.
5. PRIVACY STATEMENT
Clío magazine publicly recognizes the ethical commitment of all parties
involved in the process of intellectual development of research or research
advances. In accordance with the provisions of current Data Protection regu-
lations, we inform you that the person responsible for data treatment is per-
sonal. It will only be used to answer questions and any type of management
carried out by this means of communication, reason for which, your data will
not be transferred to third parties, except by legal obligation.
You have the right to access, rectify or delete erroneous data, request
the limitation of the processing of your data as well as oppose or withdraw
consent at any time.
CLÍO:
Revista de ciencias humanas y pensamiento crítico.
Año 3, Núm 5. Enero / Junio (2023)
Guidelines for sending and receiving papers. PP: 414-419
ISSN 2660-9037
418
6. STAGES OF THE EDITORIAL PROCESS
Once the Editor and the Editorial Committee receive an article, the review
will begin in seven weeks, plus three weeks for its publication, which are sub-
ject to the periodicity of Clío. Journal of History, Human Sciences and Critical
Thought.
Stage 1: Internal review or pre-review, within a period of two (2) weeks.
The correspondence between citations and references, the thematic com-
patibility of the article with the disciplinary blocks of the journal, as well as
the control and verication of plagiarism through software on the Web will
be veried. The author will be informed about the acceptance or rejection to
continue in the arbitration process.
Stage 2: External review, within a period of four (4) weeks, through the
inclusion of two specialist pairs, as reviewers of the article under the dou-
ble-blind modality, and in case of disagreement in the evaluation, a third
evaluator will be assigned to settle disagreements. These specialists will
make observations and issue a concept in terms of: (a) Publishable without
modications, (b) Publishable with slight modications, (c) Publishable with
substantial modications, (d) Not publishable. As can be seen in our evalua-
tion instrument.
The following criteria are taken into account in the arbitration process:
a. Content criteria: a) domain of evidenced knowledge; b) scientic ri-
gor; c) theoretical and methodological foundation; d) topicality and relevance
of the sources consulted; f) contributions to existing knowledge.
b. Formal or presentation criteria: 1) originality, relevance and ade-
quate extension of the title; 2) clarity and coherence of speech; 3) adequate
preparation of the summary; 4) internal organization of the text.
The format used by reviewers to evaluate articles includes two main pa-
rameters: formal or presentation criteria and content criteria, which will be
evaluated on a scale that expresses the values: E = Excellent B = Good R =
Fair D = Poor
Formal or presentation criteria: 1) Originality, relevance and adequa-
te extension of the title; 2) Clarity and coherence of speech; 3) Adequate
preparation of the summary: objective, methodology, results and keywords;
4) nternal organization of the text.
CLÍO:
Revista de ciencias humanas y pensamiento crítico.
Año 3, Núm 5. Enero / Junio (2023)
Guidelines for sending and receiving papers. PP: 414-419
ISSN 2660-9037
419
Content criteria:1) Domain of evidenced knowledge; 2) Scientic rigor;
3) Theoretical and methodological foundation; 4) Actuality and relevance of
the sources consulted; 5) Contributions to existing knowledge.
Once the article is refereed, the concept of publication will be made
known through an email to the contact author (s). If adjustments to the ar-
ticle are required (Accepted after completing corrections), the author (s) will
have a maximum period of 15 days to make the adjustments (this period is
part of the 5 weeks of Phase 2), and they must send a new version of the
document and a letter in which each one of the suggestions / observations
issued by the evaluators is answered. It is the responsibility of the authors to
comply with all the suggestions and recommendations sent; if there are disa-
greements, they should inform and argue their position. The editor decides if
the modied article is sent again to the same peer evaluators assigned to re-
quest their nal endorsement. Once the comments, concepts or corrections
are received, the editor, together with the Editorial Committee, makes the -
nal decision of Accepted for Publication or Not Accepted, as the case may be.
If the article is Accepted for publication (without corrections or minimal
corrections) the authors must comply with the delivery of; a) the nal version
of the article in Spanish or English, according to the preference of the au-
thors; (b) an authorization to the Editorial Committee of the journal for the
reproduction of text with the authors’ signatures; and (c) the identication
data of the authors for the respective journal database (ORCID code, full
names and email).
Rejected articles (Not accepted for publication) will be notied to their
authors via email.
Stage 3: Once the article is accepted, the nal editing and layout process
begins, in three (3) weeks, which includes the assignment of DOI and publi-
cation of the material in electronic format on the Clío platform. Journal of
History, Human Sciences and Critical Thought.
