Palabras clave
análisis basado en IA
correlación
convergencia Military
AI-based analysis
correlation
convergence
Cómo citar
Resumen
objetivo del estudio es determinar la influencia del MTC en el establecimiento de las AMP mediante el análisis de datos históricos y factores políticos, económicos, militares y socioculturales clave, teniendo en cuenta el contexto geopolítico y los intereses estratégicos de los Estados. El estudio empleó los siguientes métodos: identificación de los factores clave que influyen, análisis multifactorial, análisis retrospectivo, análisis comparativo convergente de correlación, análisis basado en inteligencia artificial (IA). El estudio confirmó que el MTC no es una condición suficiente para el establecimiento de las AMP, y que su influencia viene determinada por una combinación de factores políticos, económicos, militares y socioculturales. Se utilizó un análisis basado en IA para procesar más de 20 conjuntos de datos que abarcaban más de 200 años de datos históricos y más de 3.500 estados. El análisis comparativo de convergencia de correlaciones demostró que el establecimiento de las AMP depende más a menudo de los intereses estratégicos de los estados que del MTC.
Citas
Adisa, O. O. (2025). The cold war resurgence: A discourse on the rivalry between ECOWAS and AES in west Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and English Literature, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55220/2576683x.v9.244
Aryal, S. K., & Bharti, S. S. (2025). India’s post-independence strategic culture: A case study of India’s cooperation with the United States and Russia in military modernization. Journal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251313553
Ashidiqi, M. M., Dwi, R., Sasmita, A. W., & Gunawan, W. (2024). Defense policy: A look at bilateral cooperation. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan): Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Politik Daerah, 9(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.9.2.2024.104-117
Baranovsky, F., Kamionka, M., & Melnyk, H. (2024). Polish military diplomacy concerning Ukraine in 2022-2024: Between centrism and peripherality of direction. Balkan Social Science Review, 24(24), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr242424281b
Bolt, P. J. (2025). Strategic stability in a new era. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1504361
Brown, D., & James, P. (2017). The religious characteristics of States: Classic themes and new evidence for international relations and comparative politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(6), 1340-1376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717729882
But, S. A. (2024). Peculiarities of international military-technical cooperation. Hileya: Scientific Bulletin/Gileya, https://doi.org/10.31392/Hileya-POLITICAL-2024.7-8(197-198).06
Davies, S., Engström, G., Pettersson, T., & Öberg, M. (2024). Organized violence 1989–2023, and the prevalence of organized crime groups. Journal of Peace Research, 61(4), 673-693. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433241262912
Department of War Studies. (2025). Research. King's College London. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/warstudies/research
Diehl, P. F., Goertz, G., & Gallegos, Y. (2021). Peace data: Concept, measurement, patterns, and research agenda. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894219870288
Dimitrova, S., & Kikste, K. (2024). Prerequisites for the establishment of the Baltic-Black sea union. Environment. Technologies. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol1.7962
Fayet, H., Futter, A., Kühn, U., Kulesa, ?., van Hooft, P., & Bruusgaard, K. V. (2025). Forum: European nuclear deterrence and Donald Trump. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 67(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2025.2459011
Gibler, D. M., & Miller, S. V. (2023). The militarized interstate events (MIE) dataset, 1816–2014. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 41(4), 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942231182674
Hovsepyan, L., & Tonoyan, A. A. (2024). From alliance to ‘soft conquest’: The anatomy of the Turkish-Azerbaijani military alliance before and after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 35(4), 622-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2024.2312957
Ilnytska, U. (2024). Regional Alliance-Lublin Triangle: Geopolitical priorities and dynamics of foreign policy transformation in the context of security challenges and threats. Language, Culture, Politics. International Journal, 1(9), 115-131. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1282394
Institute for the Study of War. (2025). Research. https://www.understandingwar.org/research
International Institute for Strategic Studies (via World Bank). (2025). Armed forces personnel. World Development Indicators. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037712/World-Development-Indicators
Julius AI. (2025). Main page. https://julius.ai/
Kelleher, C. (2025). World alliances. Github. https://github.com/curran/world-alliances?tab=readme-ov-file
Khalid, F. H., & Ahmed, N. (2024). From alliance building to strategic partnerships: A historical analysis of defence diplomacy. JANUS NET E-Journal of International Relations, 15(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.15.1.1
Kucukdegirmenci, O. (2024). CICA and China’s soft balancing act towards the US. The Pacific Review, 38(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2024.2320718
Kumar, R. (2024). Russia–China strategic alignment: Are they headed towards a military alliance? China Report, 60(2), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455241287292
Kuo, T. Y. (2025). Establishing military cooperation between Taiwan and Japan: Policy suggestions and problems. In: Karalekas, D., Liu, F.-K., & Matsumura, M. (Eds.), Enhancing East Asian security coordination (pp. 39-56). https://doi.org/10.1142/13987
Lummack, R. (2025). Defence and military reform in Ukraine 2014-2022 [Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa]. University of Ottawa. https://doi.org/10.20381/ruor-30833
Lyall, J. (2022). Replication data for: Divided armies. Harvard Dataverse, V2. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DUO7IE
Military Alliances. UCDP Actor Dataset Version 24.1. (2024). Uppsala conflict data program and peace research institute Oslo. https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/index.html#armedconflict
Our World in Data. (2024). Peaceful and hostile relationships between states. Only country-pairs that have a relationship are included. Global change data lab. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/peaceful-and-hostile-relationships-between-states
Political Regime Classification by Source. (2024). Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/political-regime-classification-by-source
Political Regime. The V-Dem Dataset. (2024). The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://v-dem.net/data/the-v-dem-dataset/
Rasshyvalov, D., Portnov, Y., Sigaieva, T., Alboshchii, O., & Rozumnyi, O. (2024). Navigating geopolitical risks: Implications for global supply chain management. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7, 2024spe017. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe017
Shchokin, R., Soloviov, O., & Tantsiura, I. (2023). Strengthening cooperation between the civilian and military sectors in the context of state security: Benefits and challenges. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 83, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.83.11
Steki?, N. (2024). Analysing comprehensive strategic partnership between ?hina and Serbia: Political, economic, and military-technical relations. In: Sahakyan, M. (ed.), Routledge handbook of Chinese and Eurasian international relations (pp. 214–227). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003439110-18
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2025). Military spending as a share of GDP. SIPRI: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.55163/CQGC9685
Swedish Defence University. (2025). War studies. https://www.fhs.se/en/swedish-defence-university/research/our-research/war-studies.html
The University of Alabama. (2025). States involved in interstate conflicts. International Conflict Data Project. https://internationalconflict.ua.edu/data-download/
The World Bank Group. (2025a). GDP ranking. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0038130/GDP-ranking
The World Bank Group. (2025b). World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset version 24.1. (2024). States involved in state-based conflicts. https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/index.html#armedconflict
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2025). Research & development spending as a share of GDP. Research and Development (R&D) SDG 9.5. https://uis.unesco.org/bdds
United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human Development Report. Breaking the gridlock: Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24
World Values Survey Association. (2022). Cultural traditions and values. World Values Survey (WVS) V3.0 https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp
Wyczawski, T., & Dudek, M. (2024). NATO’s regional security in the context of military-defensive cooperation between Russia and Belarus: A Polish perspective on Eastern European stability. Acta Humanitatis, 2(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.5709/ah-02.02.2024-04
Yu, L. (2024). China-Russia military partnership. In: The rise of China and the China-Russia strategic partnership (pp. 123–159). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0997-0_4
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2025 Array