Cooperación entre la UE, la OTAN y la ONU para afrontar los retos de la seguridad mundial: Un análisis crítico

PDF (English)
HTML (English)
DOI (English)

Palabras clave

cooperación internacional
orden mundial
seguridad global
amenazas international cooperation
world order
global security
threats

Cómo citar

Lukin, S., Taran, Y., & Tykhonenko, O. (2025). Cooperación entre la UE, la OTAN y la ONU para afrontar los retos de la seguridad mundial: Un análisis crítico. Clío. Revista De Historia, Ciencias Humanas Y Pensamiento Crítico. , (10), 2163-2191. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15659424

Resumen

El objetivo del estudio es analizar la cooperación de las organizaciones internacionales en la configuración de una estrategia de seguridad global y la lucha contra las amenazas modernas. La investigación emplea los siguientes métodos: comparación gráfica, análisis estadístico y comparativo, y estudio de casos. Se determina la función de los documentos estratégicos y el papel de las organizaciones internacionales a la hora de garantizar la seguridad de los Estados miembros. Se identifican las diferencias de recursos entre países, que ponen de relieve la necesidad de iniciativas específicas de capacitación. Las estrategias para contrarrestar las amenazas híbridas que combinan tácticas convencionales y no convencionales se investigan a partir de 11 países seleccionados. Se llega a la conclusión de que las organizaciones internacionales desempeñan un papel clave en la lucha contra las amenazas a la seguridad mundial y que la ONU, la OTAN y la UE se centran principalmente en el desempeño de sus propias funciones para garantizar la estabilidad. Los esfuerzos futuros deberían centrarse en estrategias adaptativas y políticas coherentes para hacer frente a los actuales retos de seguridad interconectados.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15659424
PDF (English)
HTML (English)
DOI (English)

Citas

Araya, D., & King, M. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence on military defence and security. CIGI Papers, 263, 1–19. https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/no.263.pdf

Bajar?nas, E. (2020). Addressing hybrid threats: Priorities for the EU in 2020 and beyond. European View, 19(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685820912041

Bargués, P., & Bourekba, M. (2022). War by all means: The rise of hybrid warfare. In: Bargués, P., Moussa, B., & Colomina, C. (eds.), Hybrid threats, a vulnerable order: CIDOB report (pp. 9-13). Barcelona: CIDOB. https://shre.ink/eTNw

Boutellis, A. (2024). The UN stabilization mission in Mali (MINUSMA), twenty-first century perspectives on war, peace, and human conflict. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66466-3

China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR). (2024). Global strategic and security risks. https://shre.ink/eTEr

Christou, G., Meyer, T., & Fanni, R. (2025). The European Union: Assessing global leadership through actorness in artificial intelligence. Journal of European Integration 47(3), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2377200

Day, A., Hunt, Ch. T., Yin, H., & Kumalo, L. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of the UN mission in South Sudan (UNMISS): EPON report (no. 2). Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:7595/EPON-UNMISS-Report-LOWRES.pdf

European Commission. (December 14, 2020). The EU’s cybersecurity strategy for the digital decade. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/eus-cybersecurity-strategy-digital-decade-0

Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2023). International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. https://shre.ink/eTEe

Gargiulo, P., Giovannelli, D., & Sciacovelli, A. L. (eds.). (2024). Cybersecurity governance and normative frameworks: Non-Western countries and international organizations perspectives. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.

Gaviyau, W., & Sibindi, A. B. (2023). Global anti-money laundering and combating terrorism financing regulatory framework: A critique. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070313

Gheciu, A., & von Hlatky, S. (2024). Irreconcilable differences? NATO’s response to Russian aggression against Ukraine. International Journal Canada S Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 79(2), 275–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020241255999

Institute for Economics & Peace. (2024). Global Peace Index 2024: Measuring peace in a complex world. https://www.economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GPI-2024-web.pdf

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2021). Global Cybersecurity Index 2020. https://www.itu.int/epublications/publication/D-STR-GCI.01-2021-HTM-E

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2024). Global Cybersecurity Index 2024, 5th ed. https://www.itu.int/epublications/publication/global-cybersecurity-index-2024

Jacuch, A. (2020). Countering hybrid threats: Resilience in the EU and NATO’s strategies. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 1, 5–26. https://doi.org/10.12775/cjps.2020.001

Jungwirth, R., Smith, H., Willkomm, E., Savolainen, J., Alonso Villota, M., Lebrun, M., Aho, A., & Giannopoulos, G. (2023). Hybrid threats: A comprehensive resilience ecosystem. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/37899

Kalniete, S., & Pildegovi?s, T. (2021). Strengthening the EU’s resilience to hybrid threats. European View, 20(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858211004648

Kostyuk, N., & Sidorova, J. (2024). Role of international organizations and formal alliances in the global diffusion of national cybersecurity strategies. https://weis.utdallas.edu/files/2024/04/Kostyuk-Sidorova-WEIS-2024-9356574e1f44fb9b.pdf

Kruglashov, A. (2023). The reaction of international organizations to global security challenges. In: Global public goods and sustainable development in the practice of international organizations (chapter 3, pp. 59–84). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004687264_005

Kruhlov, V., Latynin, M., Horban, A., & Petrov, A. (2019). Public-private partnership in cybersecurity. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Cyber Hygiene (CybHyg-2019), 2654, paper 48. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2654/paper48.pdf

Lasoen, K. (2022). Realising the EU hybridtoolbox: Opportunities and pitfalls: Clingendael policy brief. Clingendael Institute (Netherlands Institute of International Relations).

Lucarelli, S., Marrone, A., & Moro, F. N. (eds.). (2021). NATO decision-making in the age of big data and artificial intelligence. Brussels: University of Bologna and Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI) of Rome. https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20210301_AC-2020_Final-Report.pdf

Moncrieff, M., Kilibarda, P., & Gaggioli, G. (2024). Social network analysis and counterterrorism: A double-edged sword for international humanitarian law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 29(1), 165–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krae002

NATO. (Jule 25, 2024a). Countering terrorism. Retrieved December 20, 2024, https://www.nato.int/cps/uk/natohq/topics_77646.htm?selectedLocale=en

NATO. (Jule 25, 2024c). NATO’s policy guidelines on counter-terrorism. Aware, capable and engaged for a safer future. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_228154.htm

NATO. (May 07, 2024b). Countering hybrid threats. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_156338.htm

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). (2024). 25 years together. OSCE Mission in Kosovo.

Radanliev, P. (2024). Cyber diplomacy: Defining the opportunities for cybersecurity and risks from artificial intelligence, ioT, blockchains, and quantum computing. Journal of Cyber Security Technology, 9(1), 28?78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23742917.2024.2312671

Ratsiborynska, V. (2022). EU-NATO and the Eastern partnership countries against hybrid threats (2016–2021). National Security and the Future, 23(2), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.37458/nstf.23.2.3

Suprunova, I., Kovalchuk, V., Lytvynchuk, O., Levchenko, I., & Lysak, K. (2024). International organizations and their role in combating terrorism and terrorist financing. Economic Affairs, 69(Special Issue), 179?186. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2024.20

The Fund for Peace. (2024). Fragile States Index 2024 [Data set]. https://fragilestatesindex.org/global-data/

United Nations Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTED). (2024). Evolving trends in the financing of foreign terrorist fighters’ activity, 2014–2024.

Usewicz, T., & Keplin, J. (2023). Hybrid actions and their effect on EU maritime security. Journal on Baltic Security, 9(1), 32–68. https://doi.org/10.57767/jobs_2023_001

World Economic Forum. (2023). The global risks report 2023, 18th ed. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2023.pdf

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2025 Array

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.