El parlamentarismo como filosofía jurídica: objeto de análisis

PDF (English)
HTML (English)
DOI (English)

Palabras clave

legitimidad constitucional
teoría democrática
utoridad legislativa,
tradiciones jurisprudenciales constitutional legitimacy
democratic theory
legislative authority
jurisprudential traditions

Cómo citar

Manukyan, M. (2025). El parlamentarismo como filosofía jurídica: objeto de análisis. Clío. Revista De Historia, Ciencias Humanas Y Pensamiento Crítico. , (11), 1649-1688. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17282359

Resumen

Esta investigación examinó el parlamentarismo como filosofía jurídica, centrándose en sus fundamentos conceptuales y su evolución en los sistemas políticos contemporáneos. El estudio empleó una combinación de métodos de análisis histórico-jurídico, comparativo y sistemático para analizar las prácticas parlamentarias en múltiples jurisdicciones. Los resultados revelaron que el parlamentarismo como filosofía jurídica va más allá de los marcos procedimentales. La investigación identificó tres tradiciones filosóficas distintas que influyen en los sistemas parlamentarios modernos: los enfoques liberal-representativo, deliberativo-consensual y basado en la soberanía. La transición de Armenia a una república parlamentaria proporcionó una valiosa perspectiva sobre cómo las democracias emergentes adaptan los principios filosóficos dentro de contextos históricos únicos. El estudio reveló además correlaciones significativas entre los enfoques filosóficos y los patrones de razonamiento judicial en comparación con los de las tradiciones liberal-representativas. El estudio concluyó que reconocer el parlamentarismo como una filosofía jurídica integral, en lugar de un mero acuerdo procedimental, crea instituciones democráticas más resilientes. Esta investigación contribuye a la teoría jurídica al reposicionar el parlamentarismo dentro de la jurisprudencia constitucional como una filosofía fundamental, en lugar de un simple marco institucional.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17282359
PDF (English)
HTML (English)
DOI (English)

Citas

Auanasova, A. M., Auanassova, K. M., & Kushenova, G. I. (2024). Alash party and issues of national statehood of Kazakhstan. Nuova Rivista Storica, 108(2), 535–549.

Bäck, H., Müller, W. C., Angelova, M., & Strobl, D. (2022). Ministerial autonomy, parliamentary scrutiny and government reform output in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 55(2), 254–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024312

Badovskis, M., Briede, J., Danovskis, E., Dupate, K., Karkli?a, A., Ketners, K., Liholaja, V., Rodi?a, A., & Strada-Rozenberga, K. (2017). Public law. En T. Kerikmäe, K. Joamets, J. Pleps, A. Rodi?a, T. Berkmanas, & E. Gruodyt? (Eds.), The law of the Baltic States (pp. 191–275). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54478-6_5

Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. (1949). https://www.bundestag.de/en/parliament/function/legal/basiclaw

Basic Law: The Knesset. (1958). https://natlex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/natlex2/files/download/86613/ISR86613.pdf

Bazaluk, O. (2019). The revival of the notion of arete in contemporary philosophy. Schole, 13(1), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-198-207

Bazaluk, O., & Nezhyva, O. (2016). Martin Heidegger and fundamental ontology. Analele Universitatii din Craiova, Seria Filozofie, 38(2), 71–83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313719433_Martin_Heidegger_and_fundamental_ontology

Benoît, C., & Rozenberg, O. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of parliamentary studies: Interdisciplinary approaches to legislatures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Cairns, H. (2019). Legal philosophy from Plato to Hegel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

Constitution of Armenia. (2015). https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Armenia_2015

Constitution of Finland. (1999). https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Finland_2011

Constitution of France. (1958). https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/anglais/constiution_anglais_oct2009.pdf

Constitution of Japan. (1947). https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html

Constitution of the Czech Republic. (1993). https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Czech_Republic_2013

Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. (2008). https://www.government.nl/documents/regulations/2012/10/18/the-constitution-of-the-kingdom-of-the-netherlands-2008

Constitution of the Republic of Korea. (1987). https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Republic_of_Korea_1987

Constitution of the Republic of Poland. (1997). https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm

Constitutional Act of Denmark. (1953). https://www.thedanishparliament.dk/en/democracy/the-constitutional-act

Coyle, S. (2021). Modern jurisprudence: A philosophical guide. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Crean, T., & Fimister, A. (2020). Integralism: A manual of political philosophy. Seelscheid: Editiones Scholasticae.

Curchin, K., Weight, T., & Ritter, A. (2024). Paternalism in Australian parliamentary debate: The case of drug testing social security recipients. Journal of Social Policy, 54(1), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000661

Destek, M. A., Usman, M., & Saqib, N. (2025). Do political cooperations and regulations manage Africa’s sustainable mineral policy? Resources Policy, 102, 105494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105494

Efremov, A. (2025). The psychology of faith and religious identity: How theology shapes worldview and self-perception. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020

Fundamental Law of Hungary. (2011). https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/the-fundamental-law-of-hungary.pdf

Gaus, G., D’Agostino, F., & Muldoon, R. (Eds.). (2025). The Routledge companion to social and political philosophy. London: Routledge.

Glavani?ová, D., & Pascucci, M. (2024). Making sense of vicarious responsibility: Moral philosophy meets legal theory. Erkenntnis, 89(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00525-x

Gopnik, A. (2023). Caregiving in philosophy, biology & political economy. Dædalus, 152(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01961

Gray, G. W. (1961). Implementing the philosophy of parliamentary practice. Speech Teacher, 10(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634526109377123

Hickman, M. F. (2025). Political philosophy and phenomenology. En N. de Warren & T. Toadvine (Eds.), Encyclopedia of phenomenology (pp. 1–9). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47253-5_345-1

Ji, L., Abdrasulov, S., Xi, C., & Karabalaeva, G. (2023). Cultural, philosophical and legal aspects of volunteering in Kyrgyzstan: Current challenges. Social and Legal Studios, 6(4), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.77

Karabalaeva, G. T., Asipova, N. A., Satybekova, M. A., Kalibekova, D. T., & Bayalieva, A. S. (2021). Training of doctors of philosophy in the Kyrgyz Republic in the context of modern trends. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(14), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i14.4809

Kelbia, S., Dziubak, S., Sendetskyi, V., & Lutskyi, R. (2025). Value of the European understanding of the rule of law for the development of the modern democratic state: Theoretical and historical aspect. Social and Legal Studios, 8(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2025.82

Ketners, K., Jarockis, A., & Petersone, M. (2024). State budget system improvement for informed decision-making in Latvia. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics, 11(3), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ3.2024.86

Kewes, P., Gunn, S., Pietrzyk-Reeves, D., Seaward, P., Sowerby, T., & Van der Meulen, J. (2022). Early modern parliamentary studies: Overview and new perspectives. History Compass, 21(1), e12757. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12757

Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, Y., Yermukanov, Y., & Alshurazova, A. (2020). Is it possible to achieve gender equality in Kazakhstan? Focus on employment and social protection. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 20(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229120927904

Kieliszek, Z. (2024). The concept of fatherhood in Kant’s philosophy and its current potential. Logos, 121, 6–27. https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2024.63

Kieliszek, Z. (2025). Religious experience and the philosophy of subjectivity: How faith shapes perception of reality. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3021

Krasivskyy, O. (2024). Development and evolution of European Union policy. Democratic Governance, 17(2), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/2.2024.46

Kushenova, G. I., Auanasova, A. M., & Drozd, R. (2025). Islamist movement in the Kazakh steppe: A historical analysis in global context. European Journal of Science and Theology, 21(2), 63–78. https://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/111/2025-21-2-05-Kushenova.pdf

Letsas, G. (2024). What’s good about parliamentary sovereignty? En G. Cartier & M. D. Walters (Eds.), Promise of legality (pp. 229–240). London: Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509970988.ch-014

Louwerse, T., & Otjes, S. (2018). How populists wage opposition: Parliamentary opposition behavithis work and populism in Netherlands. Political Studies, 67(2), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718774717

Macdonald, R. S. J., & Johnston, D. M. (Eds.). (2024). The structure and process of international law: Essays in legal philosophy, doctrine and theory. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Mackieson, P., Shlonsky, A., & Connolly, M. (2019). Increasing rigor and reducing bias in qualitative research: A document analysis of parliamentary debates using applied thematic analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 18(6), 965–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325018786996

Marx, K. (1842). The philosophical manifesto of the historical school of law. https://marxists.architexturez.net/archive/marx/works/1842/08/09.htm

McKinnell, R. A. (2023). The parliamentary regime: The political philosophy of confederation. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423923000409

Mineur, D. (2020). Theories of parliamentarism, philosophies of democracy. En C. Benoît & O. Rozenberg (Eds.), Handbook of parliamentary studies (pp. 86–100). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906516.00012

Mukhamadiyeva, G. N., Mukaldyeva, G., Karasheva, Z. T., Khamzin, A. S., Buribayev, Y. A., & Khamzina, Z. A. (2017). Modernization of social security system legal regulation in Kazakhstan: Experience and standards of the OECD members implementation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(8), 2498–2503. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v8.8(30).21

Murphy, J. (2020). Parliaments and crisis: Challenges and innovations. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2020.22

Palonen, K. (2018). Parliamentary thinking: Procedure, rhetoric and time. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90533-4

Parliament Act of the United Kingdom. (1911). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/1-2/13/contents

Priel, D. (2020). Analytic jurisprudence in time. En T. Bustamante & T. Decat (Eds.), Philosophy of law as an integral part of philosophy: Essays on the jurisprudence of Gerald J. Postema (pp. 213–241). Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933914.ch-010

Prochownik, K. M. (2021). The experimental philosophy of law: New ways, old questions, and how not to get lost. Philosophy Compass, 16(12), e12791. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12791

Qadir, A., & Syväterä, J. (2021). The moral authority of science: Evidence from parliamentary debates in seven countries. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 8(3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2021.1885461

Raube, K., Müftüler-Baç, M., & Wouters, J. (Eds.). (2019). Parliamentary cooperation and diplomacy in EU external relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438850

Sangiovanni, A., & Viehoff, J. (2023). Solidarity in social and political philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.

Schmidt, A. T., & Barrett, J. (2025). Longtermist political philosophy: An agenda for future research. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 12(1), 33–58.

Sheikh, M. K. (2019). The significance of worldview analysis for social sciences. En Entering religious minds: The social study of worldviews (pp. 111–121). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468810-11

Sheikh, M. K., & Juergensmeyer, M. (2019). Entering religious minds: The social study of worldviews. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468810

Sloma, V., Butryn-Boka, N., Trufanova, Y., Zaitseva-Kalaur, I., & Tsvigun, I. (2024). Modern technologies and European standards: Their impact on Ukrainian contract law. Law, Policy and Security, 2(2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.62566/lps/2.2024.12

Tsurkan-Saifulina, Y. V., & Dudchenko, V. V. (2018). Authority of law system formation: Applied analysis of legal system unity. Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 21(1), 1–11. https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/d685f29d-f42a-43a5-a717-d790a82a1928/content

Volk, K. (2021). The Roman Republic of letters: Scholarship, philosophy, and politics in the age of Cicero and Caesar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wacks, R. (2021). Understanding jurisprudence: An introduction to legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198864677.001.0001

Zhukorska, Y. (2024). Attribution of conduct to an international organisation: Theory and practice. Law, Policy and Security, 2(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.62566/lps/1.2024.21

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2025 Array

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.