Palabras clave
Ley Ambiental
antropocentrismo
ecofeminismo
revolución
cosmovisiones Environmental policy
revolution
worldviews
environmental law
anthropocentrism
ecofeminism
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este artículo examina el cambio de puntos de vista antropocéntricos a ecofeministas en la política ambiental y cómo este cambio podría incorporarse en una solución basada en el Pancasila para las preocupaciones ambientales globales. El antropocentrismo es la visión de que los humanos son los seres más poderosos y valiosos del planeta y que el mundo natural existe principalmente para el beneficio humano. Esta perspectiva ha dominado durante mucho tiempo la política ambiental, con leyes y prácticas centradas en la explotación de recursos naturales para el consumo humano y el beneficio económico. El ecofeminismo, por otro lado, es un punto de vista que reconoce la interdependencia de todos los seres vivos y la importancia de proteger el medio ambiente para toda la vida, no solo la vida humana. Este punto de vista enfatiza la importancia de apreciar y salvaguardar el mundo natural y de reconocer el impacto de las acciones humanas en el medio ambiente. El artículo sugiere que una transición de enfoques antropocéntricos a enfoques ecofeministas en la política ambiental es vital para abordar las actuales preocupaciones ambientales globales. Incorporar una estrategia basada en el Pancasila, que es el fundamento filosófico del estado indonesio y subraya la importancia de la unidad, la justicia y el bienestar social, puede proporcionar un marco para un enfoque holístico y sostenible de la política ambiental, según los hallazgos del estudio. El estudio implica que un enfoque basado en el Pancasila para la política ambiental enfatizaría la conservación del entorno natural y el bienestar de todos los seres vivos sobre el crecimiento económico y el beneficio humano solamente. Esta estrategia también reconocería la importancia del conocimiento y las prácticas indígenas en la gestión y conservación del medio ambiente. El estudio también destaca la importancia de incluir a las mujeres y a las comunidades marginadas en la toma de decisiones de la política ambiental, ya que estos grupos se ven desproporcionadamente afectados por la degradación ambiental y tienen perspectivas y experiencias únicas que contribuir.
Citas
Ali, A. (2015). Menguak Tabir Hukum. Kencana.
Arwida, S. D., Maharani, C. D., Basnett, B. S., & Yang, A. L. (2017). Pertimbangan terkait gender dalam pengembangan indikator REDD+:Pelajaran dari Indonesia. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006401
Biermann, F. (2021). The future of ‘environmental’ policy in the Anthropocene: Time for a paradigm shift. Environmental Politics, 30(1–2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1846958
Bram, D. (2014). Politik Hukum Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Setara Press.
Buckingham, S. (2015). Ecofeminism. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 845–850). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.91020-1
Campbell, E. K. (1983). Beyond Anthropocentrism. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 19(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198301)19:1<54::AID-JHBS2300190107>3.0.CO;2-G
Chu, E., & Karr, J. (2017). Environmental Impact: Concept, Consequences, Measurement. Reference Module in Life Sciences, B978-0-12-809633-8.02380-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.02380-3
Danusaputro, St. M. (1983, April 21). Pelestarian Lingkungan (Berlandaskan Hukum & Tata Ruang). Pidato Dies Universitas Katolik Parahyangan ke-28, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.
Donovan, J. (2006). Feminism and the Treatment of Animals: From Care to Dialogue. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(2), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1086/491750
Duckett, D., Feliciano, D., Martin-Ortega, J., & Munoz-Rojas, J. (2016). Tackling Wicked Environmental Problems: The Discourse and Its Influence on Praxis in Scotland. Special Issue Working with Wicked Problems in Socio-Ecological Systems: More Awareness, Greater Acceptance, and Better Adaptation, 154, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.015
Encarnación-Pinedo, E. (2018). Intertextuality in Diane di Prima’s Loba: Religious Discourse and Feminism. Humanities, 7(4), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/h7040132
Enizar, Nasrudin, M., & Madkur, A. (2019). Aktualisasi Nilai Pancasila Pada Perguruan Tinggi Di Propinsi Lampung: Studi Kasus Di Universitas Lampung Dan Uin Raden Intan. Pustaka Pranala.
Fadli, M., Lutfi, M., & Bakar, S. N. (2016). Hukum dan Kebijakan Lingkungan. UB Press.
Gaard, G. (2010). New Directions for Ecofeminism: Toward a More Feminist Ecocriticism. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 17(4), 643–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isq108
Galtung, J. (1988). What if the devil were interested in peace research? Journal of Peace Research, 25(1), 1–4.
Garbero, A., & Muttarak, R. (2013). Impacts of the 2010 Droughts and Floods on Community Welfare in Rural Thailand: Differential Effects of Village Educational Attainment. Ecology and Society, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05871-180427
Geisinger, A. (1999). Sustainable Development and the Domination of Nature: Spreading the Seed of the Western Ideology of Nature. Environmental Affairs, 27(1), 43–73.
Goralnik, L., & Nelson, M. P. (2012). Anthropocentrism. In R. Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Second Edition) (pp. 145–155). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00349-5
Haryadi, P. (2017). Pengembangan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Penegakan Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(1), 124–149. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1416
Hermawan, S. (2021). Demokrasi Lingkungan Hidup: Konsep, Teori, dan Isu-Isu Kontemporer di Indonesia. Setara Press.
Hesse-Bibber, S. N., & Piatelli, D. (2023). Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (By pages 557-582; 2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384740
Hsu, S. (2018). Framework for understanding sustainable development. In S. Hsu (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Development in Asia (1st ed., pp. 21–36). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351008204-2
Husein, S., Herdiansyah, H., & Putri, L. S. (2021). An Ecofeminism Perspective: A Gendered Approach in Reducing Poverty by Implementing Sustainable Development Practices in Indonesia. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(5), 210–228.
Irawan, A. D. (2020). Nationalism in a State Based on Pancasila. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 5(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v5i2.85
Juráni, M. (2020). Breaking Away from Egocentrism. Posthumanism as a Way of Contemplating Non-Human Matters on Stage. Slovenské Divadlo, 68(3), 239–252.
Karimi, A. F., & Efendi, D. (2020). Membaca Indonesia: Esai-Esai tentang Negara, Pemerintah, Rakyat, dan Tanah Airnya. Caremedia Communication.
Kim, K. (2014). The Relationship between the Law and Public Policy: Is it a Chi-Square or Normative Shape for the Policy Makers. Social Sciences, 3(4), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140304.15
Kings, A. E. (2017). Intersectionality and the Changing Face of Ecofeminism. Ethics and the Environment, 22(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.22.1.04
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & J Piccolo, J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than Just a Misunderstood Problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1
Kotzé, L. J., & French, D. (2018). The Anthropocentric Ontology of International Environmental Law and the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards an Ecocentric Rule of Law in the Anthropocene. Global Journal of Comparative Law, 7(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00701002
Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2017). Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives. SAGE Publications.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions ([2d ed., enl). University of Chicago Press.
Lafrance, M. N., & Wigginton, B. (2019). Doing critical feminist research: A Feminism & Psychology reader. Feminism & Psychology, 29(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519863075
Lalonde, R. (1994). Unity in diversity: Acceptance and integration in an era of intolerance and fragmentation. Carleton University.
Laska, S. B. (1993). Environmental Sociology and the State of the Discipline. Social Forces, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580157
MacGregor, S. (2004). From Care to Citizenship: Calling Ecofeminism Back to Politics. Ethics and the Environment, 9(1), 56–84.
Martin, J.-L., Maris, V., & Simberloff, D. S. (2016). The Need to Respect Nature and Its Limits Challenges Society and Conservation Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22), 6105–6112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525003113
McPhearson, T., M. Raymond, C., Gulsrud, N., Albert, C., Coles, N., Fagerholm, N., Nagatsu, M., Olafsson, A. S., Soininen, N., & Vierikko, K. (2021). Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good Anthropocene. Npj Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00017-x
Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Penemuan Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.
Mylius, B. (2018). Three Types of Anthropocentrism. Environmental Philosophy, 15(2), 159–194.
Natalis, A. (2020). Reformasi Hukum dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Keadilan bagi Perempuan: Telaah Feminist Jurisprudence. Crepido, 2(1), 11–23.
Nhanenge, J. (2011). Ecofeminism: Towards Integrating the Concerns of Women, Poor People, and Nature into Development. UPA.
Örjan, B. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Permatasari, Rr. Y. A., & Siswadi, G. A. (2022). Ekofeminisme di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Reflektif atas Peran Perempuan Terhadap Lingkungan. Purwadita : Jurnal Agama dan Budaya, 6(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.55115/purwadita.v6i1.1687
Petersmann, M.-C. (2018). Narcissus’ Reflection in the Lake: Untold Narratives in Environmental Law beyond the Anthropocentric Frame. Journal of Environmental Law, 0, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy001
Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (1996). Ecology: Scientific, Deep and Feminist. Environmental Values, 5(2), 123–146.
Poonia, M., & Sharma, S. (2017). Environmental Studies. Khanna Book Publishing Company (P) Limited.
Roka, K. (2019). Anthropocene and Climate Change. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Climate Action (pp. 1–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_26-1
Rosemary, R. R. (1995). Ecofeminism: Symbolic and Social Connections of the Oppression of Women and the Domination of Nature. Feminist Theology, 3(9), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/096673509500000903
Saija, V. J. E. (2014). Wewenang Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pemberian Izin Lingkungan Hidup. SASI, 20(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v20i1.347
Sandilands, C. (1997). Wild Democracy: Ecofeminism, Politics, and the Desire Beyond. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 18(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/3346970
Santamaría-Dávila, J., Cantera-Espinosa, L. M., Blanco-Fernández, M., & Cifre-Gallego, E. (2019). Women’s Ecofeminist Spirituality: Origins and Applications to Psychotherapy. Explore, 15(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2018.05.004
Shelton, D. (2006). Human Rights and the Environment: What Specific Environmental Rights Have Been Recognized? Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 35(1), 129–171.
Shiva, V., Mies, M., & Salleh, A. (2014). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.
Sui, D. Z., & Rejeski, D. W. (2002). Environmental Impacts of the Emerging Digital Economy: The E-for-Environment E-Commerce? Environmental Management, 29(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-001-0027-X
Tempels, P. (1959). Bantu philosophy. Presence africaine.
Toumbourou, T. (2018). ‘Empty pocket season’: Dayak women farmers surviving the impacts of palm oil. Earth Journalism Network (EJN). https://earthjournalism.net/stories/empty-pocket-season-dayak-women-farmers-surviving-the-impacts-of-palm-oil
van Kan, J. (1943). Inleiding tot de rechtswetenschap. Querido.
Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2013). Bringing the Human to “Humanism”: Freeing Humanism and Society from the Myths of the “Enlightenment.” Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1558/eph.v14.1
Wahid, A. M. Y. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Lingkungan (ke-2). Prenada Media.
Warassih, E., Rahayu, D. P., & Faisal. (2020). Sosiologi Hukum: Suatu Pengantar Dimensi Hukum dan Masyarakat. Litera.
Warren, K. (2000). Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on what it is and why it Matters. Rowman & Littlefield.
Wibisana, M. R. A. G. (2021). Antroposen dan Hukum: Hukum Lingkungan dalam Masa-Masa Penuh Bahaya. Pidato Pada Upacara Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1957). A Vindication of the Rights of Women. The Vindications. Ed.
Zimdahl, R. L. (2010). Agriculture’s Ethical Horizon. Elsevier Science.