Keywords
estudios métricos
bibliometría
indicadores bibliométricos digital humanities
metric studies
bibliometrics
bibliometric indicators
How to Cite
Abstract
The intellectual production of the Digital Humanities is shown in the data sources: Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions, Lens and Google Scholar, in the years: 2000-2024, through documentary research that integrates bibliometric analysis to highlight clusters of greater significance and present them through VOSviewer and Bibliometrix, in productivity graphs, citation, co-term networks and co-authorship. It stands out that intellectual production has had a high presence in the last twelve years, with a rebound in the last five, from the countries; United States, Germany, Spain and China that privilege academic and scientific documents, such as articles, books and chapters resulting from research that reveal five clusters from their keywords in which recurring concepts appear such as: digital libraries, human role, semantic web and natural language processing, computational humanities and open data, which leave evidence of the potential of the field of Digital Humanities, due to its interdisciplinarity and its correlation with industries 4 and 5.0, such as: virtual reality, natural language processing , open and citizen science at the service of humanistic knowledge, which impacts professional training in history, literature, linguistics, among other areas of the Humanities and Information Studies.
References
Aguirre-Ligüera, N., Vienni-Baptista, B. y Fontans, E. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36(3), 343-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129599
Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T. & Schnapp, J. (2012). Digital_Humanities. Mit Press.
Del Rio Riande, G. (2022). ¿En qué lengua citamos cuando escribimos sobre Humanidades Digitales? Revista de Humanidades Digitales, 7, 127-143. https://www.aacademica.org/gimena.delrio.riande/189.pdf
Downie, J. (2005). Music information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 295-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370108
Galina Russell, I. (2011). ¿Qué son las humanidades digitales? Revista Digital Universitaria, 12(7). https://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.12/num7/art68/art68.pdf
Gold, M. (Ed.) (2012). Debates in the digital humanities. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Grandjean, M. (2016). A social network analysis of Twitter: Mapping the digital humanities community. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 3(1), 1171458. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1171458
Hamilton, W., Leskovec, J. & Jurafsky, D. (2016). Cultural shift or linguistic drift? Comparing two computational measures of semantic change. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2116-2121. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1229
Hernández-Lorenzo, L. (2022). Introducción al panorama internacional de las humanidades digitales. Revista de Humanidades, 137-166.
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big data & society, 1(1), 2053951714528481.
Le Deuff, O. (2018). Les Humanités Digitales, historique et développements. London: ISTE Editions.
Luhman, J. & Burghardt, M (2017) Digital humanities—A discipline in its own right? An analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.24533
Rodríguez-Yunta, L. (2013). Humanidades digitales, ¿una mera etiqueta o un campo por el que deben apostar las ciencias de la documentación? Anuario ThinkEPI, 7, 37-43. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/19368
Ronen, S., Gonçalves, B., Hu, K., Vespignani, A., Pinker, S. & Hidalgo, C. A. (2014). Links that speak: The global language network and its association with global fame. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410931111
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R. & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2004). A companion to digital humanities. Blackwell Pub.
Sharma, D. & Bhaskar, S. (2020). Addressing the covid-19 burden on medical education and training: The role of telemedicine and tele-education during and beyond the pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 589669. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.589669 Tang, M., Cheng, Y. & Chen, K. (2017). A longitudinal study of intellectual cohesion in digital humanities using bibliometric analyses. Scientometrics, 113(2), 9851008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2496-6
Tobalina-Pulido y Rodríguez Velásquez. (2023). Historia y Humanidades Digitales. Tekoa, 2, 1. https://revistas.unila.edu.br/tekoa/article/view/3986/3315
Valdivia, P., Buono, P., Plaisant, C., Dufournaud, N. & Fekete, J. (2021). Analyzing dynamic hypergraphs with parallel aggregated ordered hypergraph visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2933196
Weingart, S. & Eichmann-Kalwara, N. (2017). What’s Under the Big Tent? A Study of ADHO Conference Abstracts. Digital Studies/le Champ Numérique, 7(1), 6. http://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.284
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Array