International legal standards for documentation and investigation of war crimes

PDF
HTML
DOI

Keywords

plataforma digital
documentación digital
multimodalidad
verificación
blockchain
análisis OSINT
justicia internacional digital platform
digital documentation
multimodality
verification
blockchain
OSINT analysis
international justice

How to Cite

Loshytskyi, M., Yunin, O., Kyslenko, D., Tychna, B., & Dotsenko, O. (2025). International legal standards for documentation and investigation of war crimes. Clio. Journal of History, Human Sciences and Critical Thought., (10), 1818-1855. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15598036

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to eliminate multimodality of information flows in documenting war crimes. Existing digital solutions are fragmented, which complicates the integration of evidence into international judicial mechanisms. The proposed digital platform will ensure standardization, verification, and reliability of the evidence base. The aim of the study is to assess international standards for documenting and investigating war crimes, identify their shortcomings, and develop the concept of a digital platform for the unification and legal legitimization of the evidence base. The study employed the following methods: structural analysis, topological detailing, perfection analysis, structural optimization, comparative analysis, parametric analysis, conceptual modelling. The study confirms the need for a unified international platform for documenting war crimes. The current system contains 17 structural elements in three areas: regulatory framework, documentation and investigation, but is characterized by fragmentation, political constraints and the lack of common standards. An analysis of 25 digital platforms showed that 32% focus on evidence preservation, 28% on Open source intelligence (OSINT) analysis, 20% on archiving, and 20% on legal support and international coordination. The proposed platform integrates blockchain, automated verification and multi-factor analysis, which can increase the accuracy of documentation by 50%, reduce the time for checking evidence by 60%, as well as significantly strengthen international cooperation. The academic novelty of the study is the created model of an international digital platform that unites the evidence base, automates verification, and promotes international coordination of investigations. Further research should focus on launching a pilot project of the platform to test its features, effectiveness, and compliance with international standards. Important areas include integration with national and international justice bodies and the development of mechanisms for legal regulation of its operation.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15598036
PDF
HTML
DOI

References

Al-Billeh, T., Al-Hammouri, A., Khashashneh, T., AL Makhmari, M. & Al Kalbani, H. (2024). Digital evidence in human rights violations and international criminal justice. Culture and Legal System, 4(3), 842–871. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i3.446

Allan, S. (2025). Visual war journalism. Digital Journalism, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2443153

Bienert, R. & Grandke, S. (2024). Bavarian killing fields uncovered: Early non-jewish survivors as (forgotten) agents in documenting nazi crimes and tracing victims.

Caroli, P. (2024). Belated justice without punishment: The prosecution of nazi war criminals in italy.

D’Alessandra, F. (2024). The Ten-Year Revolution. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 22(2), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqae011

Florczak, A., Jach, A. & Ros?on-?muda, J. (2024). The role of states and international organisations in bringing war crimes to account in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003558040

Grzebyk, P. & Uczkiewicz, D. (2024). The Russian-Ukrainian conflict and war crimes. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003493785

Hultman, L., Liyanage, H. & Wieselgren, H. (2025). Principled and pragmatic: Reconciling competing arguments for ICC attention. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661241311235

Kersten, M. (2025). The international criminal court’s pursuit of justice and legitimacy. Current History, 124(858), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2025.124.858.15

Kljai?, M. (2024). Tenth Report on War Crimes Trials in Serbia during 2023. https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=1276726

Križi? Roban, S. (2024). Looking into themselves. Photography and Culture, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2024.2394251

Kuczy?ska, H. (2024). Digital evidence in investigations concerning Russian crimes in Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003493785

Malinauskaite, G. (2024). Holocaust and soviet war crimes trials in the cold war context: The 1964 klaipeda war crimes trial.

Mokhiber, C. (2025). Law on trial: Gaza and the future of the international legal order. Dialectical Anthropology, 49(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624

Nwala, ?. (2024) The position of international law in transnational aggression; a perspective on the israeli-palestinian war, 1948-2023. RSU Journal of Humanities, 79, 79-95. https://shorturl.at/ecS42

Ochi, M. & Dagenborg, H. (2025). Online war-crime archives: A call for a universal guideline.

Peake, J. (2024). Challenges of using digital evidence for war crimes prosecutions: Availability, reliability, admissibility. AJIL Unbound, 118, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2024.5

Plesch, D., Thaler, J. & Uczkiewicz, D. (2024). Precedent for Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003493785

Poole, D., Andersen, D., Raymond, N., Parham, J., Howarth, C., Hathaway, O. & Khoshnood, K. (2025). The effect of conflict on damage to medical facilities in Mariupol, Ukraine: A quasi-experimental study. PLOS Global Public Health, 5(1), 0003950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003950

Popov, G., Puhach, A., Shkolnikov, V., Baranovska, T. & Orobets, K. (2025). Assessing war crimes during armed conflicts: Insights from Ukraine and global standards. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), 03391. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965

Rae, M. (2025). ‘How we brought down a war criminal’: Defamation cases as an alternative space for justice.

Roman, M. (2024). Documenting cold war truth: Human rights abuses and spiritual death in the USSR and the US. Journal of Contemporary History, 59(2), 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094231220956

Steinberg, G. (2024). Documenting the enablers of Hamas war crimes: UN agencies, government aid programs and NGOs. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/x3ffh90

Stetz, M. (2024). Documenting war crimes onstage in Kyo Choi’s the apology. Humanities Bulletin, 7(2), 158-166. https://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/HB/article/view/2917

Subandi, I. (2025). Quo vadis “international (criminal) law enforcement” by the international criminal court? In Atlantis highlights in social sciences, education and humanities.

Veriandy, M. V., Rangkuti, L. H. Y., & Rosmalinda. (2025). The legal issue of granting political asylum to Bashar al-Assad by Russia. Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 9(1), 16-33.

Visual Paradigm Online. (2025). Visual Paradigm Online. https://online.visual-paradigm.com/drive/#proj=0&dashboard

Ward, E. & Hamourtziadou, L. (2024). The importance of documenting the casualties of armed conflict. Journal of Global Faultlines, 11(2), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.11.2.191

Zakir, M. H., Begum, M., Rahman, A., Bilal, M., Tayyab, A. & Khan, S. (2024). The role of international criminal law in addressing war crimes and crimes against humanity. Kurdish Studies, 12(4), 535-543.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Array

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.